Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 12:03
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Can both male and female cows be milked? Can bulls also be milked?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Coating satellites with super-black paint Vantablack could help fight light pollution crisis - Space
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Do you think Andrew Tate and Nigel Farage are part of a "similar phenomenon"?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What ended your relationship with your best friend?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Does Taylor Swift actually play the guitar, or is it a prop?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Utah woman loses 100 pounds in one year: Here's how - KSL News
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.